Yahoo Web Search

  1. Yahoo Finance Results

  2. On Nov. 16, 2018, the U.S. Department of Education issued proposed regulations to supplement Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 in response to a dire need for clarification of the ...

  3. Web results

  4. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. Unknown Owners, Defendants ...

    caselaw.findlaw.com/il-court-of-appeals/1035379.htmlCached

    No. 2-08-0286. Decided: July 31, 2009 Pritpal Singh (Singh) appeals from the denial of his motion for apportionment of an award received by BP Products of North America and Amoco Oil Company (BP) 1 upon the condemnation of property that was owned by BP and leased by Singh.

  5. BRACKEN v. UNKNOWN | No. 2:17-cv-00189 AC. | 42 ...

    www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20170201872Cached

    No other pleadings have been filed by the plaintiff. Plaintiff has not named any defendants. In order to commence an action, plaintiff must file a complaint as required by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and plaintiff must either pay the required filing fee or file an application requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 1 ...

  6. Butler v. Unknown Defendant :: Justia Dockets & Filings

    dockets.justia.com/docket/texas/txndce/7:2018cv...Cached

    October 25, 2018 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. File to: No court file needed. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Ray). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically ...

  7. NOEL v. UNKNOWN | No. 2:18-cv-01687-JAM-CKD PS ...

    www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20180615999Cached

    Federal courts generally allow the use of "Doe" or fictitiously-named defendants in federal question cases, provided that the complaint alleges why the defendant's real name was not then known or ascertainable. See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics (1971) 403 U.S. 388, 390, fn. 2; Maclin v.

  8. Parker #593090 v. Unknown Part(y)(ies) et al, No. 2 ...

    law.justia.com/.../miwdce/2:2018cv00055/90585/9Cached

    It is a discrete incident, isolated in time and place from Plaintiff’s additional allegations against the URF Defendants. Plaintiff makes no allegation against a URF Defendant that is related to the CFA Transfer Coordinator’s allegedly improper transfer of Plaintiff to URF.

  9. TOWNS v. PHILADELPHIA CORRECTIONS OFFICERS UNKNOWN et al, No ...

    law.justia.com/.../paedce/2:2016cv03584/519531/29Cached

    towns v. philadelphia corrections officers unknown et al doc. 29 in the united states district court for the eastern district of pennsylvania akenshai towns, plaintiff, civil action no. 16-3584 v. city of philadelphia, et al, defendants.

  10. Unknown Plaintiff v. Unknown Defendants :: Justia Dockets ...

    dockets.justia.com/docket/new-york/nysdce/1:2018...Cached

    Notice to attorney Brent W Coon to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Statement of Relatedness. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong event type was used to file the related case statement.

  11. Resident Defendant Exception for Removal: A Clever Move or ...

    apps.americanbar.org/litigation/committees/trialpractice/...Cached

    , No. 13-cv-118, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162980 (D.N.H. Nov. 15, 2013). If you represent a resident defendant who has been sued in state court but has not yet been served, removal to federal court is an option worthy of consideration when your client prefers a federal venue.

  12. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN ...

    www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-mied-2_06-mc...

    Unknown Defendant known as MLS National Evaluation Services, Inc., Gracian Joseph Schimizzi, and Anthony Schimizzi, for a Protective Order, and the Court having reviewed all materials submitted by the parties, and being otherwise sufficiently advised, the Defendant’s Petition for a Protective Order is GRANTED.

  13. Perri v. BURGER KING #9945, a business of unknown form ...

    www.docketbird.com/.../cacd-2:2018-cv-05674-00013Cached

    BURGER KING #9945, a business of unknown form et al Central District of California, cacd-2:2018-cv-05674 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) {{1}} as to Defendant Burger King No. 9945.