COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), for its Complaint against Defendants Invest Better 2001 ("IB2001") and John and Jane Does 1-10 ("Does 1-10") (collectively, the "Defendants"), alleges as follows:
disciplinary board of the supreme court of pennsylvania, paul killion, john/jane does 1-10, defendants. 11cv1030 electronically filed memorandum order
Defendant: CASA GRANDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT #4, a body politic of the municipality of Casa Grande, Arizona, PATRICIA and JOHN DOE WATSON, a married couple, MARY and JOHN DOE RASCON, a married couple and others
JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 100, JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10, and OTHER JOHN DOE ENTITIES 1 THROUGH 10, all whose true names are unknown, Defendants. COMPLAINT
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ... Invest Better 2001, Cole A. Bartiromo, and John/Jane Does 1-10, 01 Civ. 11427 (BSJ)(S.D.N.Y. filed January 7, ...
Legal Help for Civil Procedure - Service of Process: TX I filed an action to quiet title and included John and Jane Does 1-10 as defendants.
It is just a way expressing a quantity of "JOHN or JANE DOES" in a plaintiff's pleadings (when defendant's names are unknown to plaintiff). Example:
against the remaining defendants, John and Jane Does 1-10. The dismissal of the charges against the Doe defendants was entered on April 22, 2004, and Mueller
NO. 16-36038 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JANE AND JOHN DOES 1-10, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
- related to John/Jane Does #1-10