Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich Co., LPA 24755 Chagrin Boulevard, Cleveland, Ohio 44122 * First Name:
syllabus october term, 2009 jerman v. carlisle, mcnellie, rini,kramer & ulrich lpa supreme court of the united states. jerman v.carlisle, mcnellie, rini, kramer & ulrich lpa et al.
carlisle, m c nellie, rini, kramer & ulrich lpa et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit No. 08–1200.Argued January 13, 2010—Decided April 21, 2010
Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich Co., LPA, a Cleveland, Ohio (OH) Law Firm -
carlisle, mcnellie, rini, kramer & ulrich lpa, et al. on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit. brief for the united states
3 • “Debt collector”: Any person who uses any instrumentality of interstate commerce or the mails in any business the principal purpose of which is the collection of any debts, or who regularly collects or attempts to collect, directly or
2 JERMAN v. CARLISLE, MCNELLIE, RINI, KRAMER & ULRICH LPA Syllabus ing, Carlisle had violated §1692g(a) of the FDCPA, which governs the contents of notices to debtors.
Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, LPA A law firm filed a lawsuit to foreclose a mortgage held by its client on property owned by Karen Jerman. The complaint included a "notice" stating that the mortgage debt would be assumed to be valid unless Jerman disputed it in writing.
Merits BriefsBrief for Petitioner Karen L. JermanBrief for Respondents Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPAReply Brief for Petitioner Karen L. JermanAmicus BriefsBri